Return to the archive index

RE: XP embedded and .NET...

From: "Roger Gonzalez" <>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:58:09 -0400

> Maybe not quite right, but the general picture is right.
> Renaming and rebundling is the M$ way.
> I have no interest in Sun so this is not FUD.
> But I used to be a FUD fighter :)

It just frustrates me to read such obviously incorrect M$ bashing.  I mean,
there are SO many REAL reasons to bash 'em!  I'm not going to be a M$
apologist, but the core of .Net is actually pretty interesting.

I'm fairly non-partisan these days - I have four Linux boxes in my house,
and I use a dual-monitor W2K setup as my front end (the monitors are held up
with a Dec Alpha and a Sparc IPX -- sad, but buying genuine monitor stands
from Staples was going to cost me more than what I could get for hocking my
ancient workstations on eBay!) and am seriously considering getting
something to run OS-X.  I do multiplatform C++ and I've done Java in the
past (a bunch of my friends worked in the Java group at Sun), and if I've
learned anything in my career, its that sucky software transcends all
borders.  :-)

-Roger

Roger Gonzalez
mailto:

--
Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/expander/false domain

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail